preprint وصول مفتوح

Not All Requirements Prioritization Criteria Are Equal at All Times: A Quantitative Analysis

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cornell University
Research footprint

At a glance

الاستشهادات
1
المراجع
52
Comments
0
Paper overview

Abstract

Requirement prioritization is recognized as an important decision-making activity in requirements engineering and software development. Requirement prioritization is applied to determine which requirements should be implemented and released. In order to prioritize requirements, there are several approaches/techniques/tools that use different requirements prioritization criteria, which are often identified by gut feeling instead of an in-depth analysis of which criteria are most important to use. Therefore, in this study we investigate which requirements prioritization criteria are most important to use in industry when determining which requirements are implemented and released, and if the importance of the criteria change depending on how far a requirement has reached in the development process. We conducted a quantitative study of one completed project from one software developing company by extracting 32,139 requirements prioritization decisions based on eight requirements prioritization criteria for 11,110 requirements. The results show that not all requirements prioritization criteria are equally important, and this change depending on how far a requirement has reached in the development process.

Record transparency

Publication details

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2104.06033
OpenAlex
W4287214133
Document type
preprint
Language
EN
Source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Last metadata update
المجتمع

Comments

تسجيل الدخول للانضمام إلى النقاش.

  1. لا توجد تعليقات بعد. ابدأ النقاش.