conference-paper Open access

Analysis of Regions of Interest and Distractor Regions in Breast Biopsy Images

Research footprint

At a glance

Citations
2
References
15
Comments
0
Paper overview

Abstract

This paper studies why pathologists can misdiagnose diagnostically challenging breast biopsy cases, using a data set of 240 whole slide images (WSIs). Three experienced pathologists agreed on a consensus reference ground-truth diagnosis for each slide and also a consensus region of interest (ROI) from which the diagnosis could best be made. A study group of 87 other pathologists then diagnosed test sets (60 slides each) and marked their own regions of interest. Diagnoses and ROIs were categorized such that if on a given slide, their ROI differed from the consensus ROI and their diagnosis was incorrect, that ROI was called a distractor. We used the HATNet transformer-based deep learning classifier to evaluate the visual similarities and differences between the true (consensus) ROIs and the distractors. Results showed high accuracy for both the similarity and difference networks, showcasing the challenging nature of feature classification with breast biopsy images. This study is important in the potential use of its results for teaching pathologists how to diagnose breast biopsy slides.

Record transparency

Publication details

DOI
10.1109/bhi50953.2021.9508513
OpenAlex
W3193027898
Document type
conference-paper
Language
EN
Last metadata update
Community

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

  1. No comments yet. Start the discussion.