conference-paper Open access

Measurement of Software Development Effort Estimation Bias: Avoiding Biased Measures of Estimation Bias

Research footprint

At a glance

Citations
1
References
24
Comments
0
Paper overview

Abstract

In this paper, we propose improvements in how estimation bias, e.g., the tendency towards under-estimating the effort, is measured. The proposed approach emphasizes the need to know what the estimates are meant to represent, i.e., the type of estimate we evaluate and the need for a match between the type of estimate given and the bias measure used. We show that even perfect estimates of the mean effort will not lead to an expectation of zero estimation bias when applying the frequently used bias measure: (actual effort – estimated effort)/actual effort. This measure will instead reward under-estimates of the mean effort. We also provide examples of bias measures that match estimates of the mean and the median effort, and argue that there are, in general, no practical bias measures for estimates of the most likely effort. The paper concludes with implications for the evaluation of bias of software development effort estimates.

Record transparency

Publication details

DOI
10.5121/csit.2022.120607
OpenAlex
W4220979644
Document type
conference-paper
Language
EN
Last metadata update
Community

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

  1. No comments yet. Start the discussion.