article Open access

Hierarchical Quantum Error Correction with Hypergraph Product Code and Rotated Surface Code

  • Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
  • University of Oxford
Research footprint

At a glance

Citations
0
References
32
Comments
0
Paper overview

Abstract

Abstract We propose and analyze a hierarchical quantum error correction (QEC) scheme that concatenates hypergraph product (HGP) codes with rotated surface codes and that is compatible with quantum computers with only nearest-neighbor interactions. The outer code employs (3,4)-random HGP codes, known for their constant encoding rate and favorable distance scaling, while the inner code consists of a rotated surface code with distance 5, allowing hardware compatibility through lattice surgery. To address the decoding bottleneck, we utilize a soft-decision decoding strategy that combines belief propagation with ordered statistics decoding, enhanced by a syndrome-conditioned logical error probability computed via a tailored lookup table for the inner code. Numerical simulations under a code capacity noise model demonstrate that our hierarchical codes achieve logical error suppression below the threshold. Furthermore, we derive explicit conditions under which the proposed codes surpass surface codes as a QEC code in both qubit efficiency and error rate. In particular, for the size parameter $s \ge 4$ (which corresponds to 16 logical qubits) and the distance $d\ge 25$, our construction outperforms the rotated surface code in practical regimes with physical error rates around or less than $10^{-2}$. These results suggest that concatenated quantum low-density parity-check surface architectures can offer a scalable and resource-efficient path toward near-term fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Record transparency

Publication details

DOI
10.1093/ptep/ptaf130
OpenAlex
W4414435926
Document type
article
Language
EN
Source
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
Last metadata update
Community

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

  1. No comments yet. Start the discussion.