preprint Open access

Publication Bias

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cornell University
Research footprint

At a glance

Citations
0
References
30
Comments
0
Paper overview

Abstract

Background: Publication bias is the failure to publish the results of a study based on the direction or strength of the study findings. The existence of publication bias is firmly established in areas like medical research. Recent research suggests the existence of publication bias in Software Engineering. Aims: Finding out whether experiments published in the International Workshop on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) are affected by publication bias. Method: We review experiments published in ESEM. We also survey with experimental researchers to triangulate our findings. Results: ESEM experiments do not define hypotheses and frequently perform multiple testing. One-tailed tests have a slightly higher rate of achieving statistically significant results. We could not find other practices associated with publication bias. Conclusions: Our results provide a more encouraging perspective of SE research than previous research: (1) ESEM publications do not seem to be strongly affected by biases and (2) we identify some practices that could be associated with p-hacking, but it is more likely that they are related to the conduction of exploratory research.

Record transparency

Publication details

OpenAlex
W3175689999
Document type
preprint
Language
EN
Source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Last metadata update
Community

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

  1. No comments yet. Start the discussion.