preprint Open access

Are Clinical T5 Models Better for Clinical Text?

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cornell University
Research footprint

At a glance

Citations
1
References
0
Comments
0
Paper overview

Abstract

Large language models with a transformer-based encoder/decoder architecture, such as T5, have become standard platforms for supervised tasks. To bring these technologies to the clinical domain, recent work has trained new or adapted existing models to clinical data. However, the evaluation of these clinical T5 models and comparison to other models has been limited. Are the clinical T5 models better choices than FLAN-tuned generic T5 models? Do they generalize better to new clinical domains that differ from the training sets? We comprehensively evaluate these models across several clinical tasks and domains. We find that clinical T5 models provide marginal improvements over existing models, and perform worse when evaluated on different domains. Our results inform future choices in developing clinical LLMs.

Record transparency

Publication details

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2412.05845
OpenAlex
W4405253660
Document type
preprint
Language
EN
Source
arXiv (Cornell University)
Last metadata update
Community

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

  1. No comments yet. Start the discussion.