conference-paper
Open access
Principled Multi-Aspect Evaluation Measures of Rankings
Research footprint
At a glance
- Citations
- 25
- References
- 50
- Comments
- 0
Paper overview
Abstract
Information Retrieval evaluation has traditionally focused on defining principled ways of assessing the relevance of a ranked list of documents with respect to a query. Several methods extend this type of evaluation beyond relevance, making it possible to evaluate different aspects of a document ranking (e.g., relevance, usefulness, or credibility) using a single measure (multi-aspect evaluation). However, these methods either are (i) tailor-made for specific aspects and do not extend to other types or numbers of aspects, or (ii) have theoretical anomalies, e.g. assign maximum score to a ranking where all documents are labelled with the lowest grade with respect to all aspects (e.g., not relevant, not credible, etc.).
Record transparency
Publication details
- DOI
- 10.1145/3459637.3482287
- OpenAlex
- W3208358587
- Document type
- conference-paper
- Language
- EN
- Last metadata update
Comments
Log in to join the discussion.