article

Dispossession, Un-freedom, Precarity

  • South Atlantic Quarterly
  • Duke University Press
Research footprint

At a glance

Citations
3
References
8
Comments
0
Paper overview

Öz

The partition of the Indian subcontinent forced millions of people to flee to the other side of the borders, freshly demarcated by the British colonial rulers just on the eve of their departure from South Asia. Almost a decade-long migration of people could not, however, settle the boundaries and lives of the people once and for all. The postcolonial rulers retained many of the draconian laws of the late colonial period, like the Foreigners’ Act in India, and laced them with new laws and regulations, thus leading to greater dispossession of people of homes, generating widespread situations of un-freedom, and creating countless refugees and stateless persons, mostly forced to survive in sites of precarious life, without any right to have rights. The concern of this contribution is this politics of dispossession in postcolonial South Asia and its relation with citizenship laws of the region.

Record transparency

Publication details

DOI
10.1215/00382876-8795866
OpenAlex
W3106559656
Document type
article
Language
EN
Source
South Atlantic Quarterly
Last metadata update
Community

Comments

Oturum Açın to join the discussion.

  1. No comments yet. Start the discussion.